ONUMA Medical Planner alternatives
If ONUMA Medical Planner is not the fit, the strongest conceptual massing alternatives here are Rhino 3D, Autodesk Forma Site Design, and Blender. Rhino 3D brings from $995, API agent access, 3DM, DWG, DXF, IFC formats. Autodesk Forma Site Design brings Subscription, API agent access, IFC, RVT, glTF formats. Blender brings Free tier + from $0, CLI / API agent access, BLEND, FBX, OBJ, glTF formats.
This page compares every reviewed same-sub-category peer for ONUMA Medical Planner, using the same verdict, score, pricing, agent-access, and format signals as the main hub.
Last updated 2026-07-19.
Conceptual Massing alternatives comparison
| Tool | Verdict | Composite | Price signal | Agent access | Key formats |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhino 3D C1 5/5 reflects the $995 one-time license with a trial, C4 4/5 reflects 3DM, DWG, DXF, IFC-via-plugin, STEP, IGES, OBJ, FBX, STL, and SKP exchange, and C5 5/5 reflects SketchUp, Revit via Rhino.Inside.Revit or IFC, V-Ray, Enscape, Lumion, and Grasshopper interoperability. Firm-size fit is solo to growing. | Worth it | 4.2 | from $995 | API | 3DM, DWG, DXF, IFC |
| Autodesk Forma Site Design C2 4/5 and C4 5/5: Autodesk documents APS API access plus IFC, RVT, and glTF support, and the integration stack includes Revit, Civil 3D, Autodesk Tandem, Esri ArcGIS, and Zoneomics. Firm-size fit is small-team to growing. | Solid | 3.8 | Subscription | API | IFC, RVT, glTF |
| Blender C1 5/5 reflects the free tier, C2 3/5 reflects CLI and Python bpy automation, and C4 5/5 reflects BLEND, FBX, OBJ, glTF, GLB, DXF, STL, USD, and COLLADA workflows. Integrations include Unreal Engine, Unity, and Substance Painter; firm-size fit is solo to small-team. | Solid | 3.8 | Free tier + from $0 | CLI / API | BLEND, FBX, OBJ, glTF |
| SketchUp C1 5/5 reflects published pricing from $129/yr with a trial, C3 5/5 reflects the web, desktop, and iPad surface, and C5 4/5 reflects Revit, ARCHICAD, Lumion, Enscape, V-Ray, and Trimble Connect integrations. Exchange includes SKP plus DWG, DXF, IFC, FBX, OBJ, STL, and DAE, while C2 1/5 reflects no public CLI or MCP surface; firm-size fit is solo to growing. | Solid | 3.6 | from $129 | API | SKP, DWG, DXF, IFC |
| Skema C1 4/5 reflects the free community tier plus self-serve paid tiers, C4 4/5 reflects RVT round-trip and IFC export, and C5 4/5 reflects the Revit, Grasshopper, and Miro integration set. C2 2/5 reflects the absence of public developer docs for the vendor-claimed API surface. | Solid | 3.6 | Free tier + from $199 | API | RVT, IFC |
| Giraffe C1 4/5 reflects the usable free tier plus the self-serve Core entry, C2 3/5 reflects the documented Workspace API and JavaScript SDK, C4 4/5 reflects IFC and DWG export, and C5 3/5 reflects the Revit, ArcGIS, and Rhino integration set. Firm-size fit spans solo to growing. | Solid | 3.6 | Free tier + from $0 | API | IFC, DWG |
| Archistar C2 4/5 reflects the public API with API-key auth, and C4 3/5 reflects JSON output. This placement is the zoning and feasibility surface rather than a model-authoring stack; firm-size fit is solo to small-team. | Solid | 3.4 | Subscription | API | JSON |
| FreeCAD C2 3/5 reflects CLI plus the Python API, C4 5/5 reflects FCStd, STEP, IGES, IFC, STL, DXF, OBJ, DAE, and SVG exchange, and C5 4/5 reflects Revit via IFC and BricsCAD via DWG/DXF interoperability. RF4 and C3 2/5 reflect the steeper community-supported adoption path, and firm-size fit is solo. | Solid | 3.4 | Free tier + from $0 | CLI / API | FCStd, STEP, IGES, IFC |
| Modelur C1 4/5 reflects published subscription pricing plus a free non-commercial plan, and C4 4/5 reflects DWG import with XLSX LiveSync. C2 2/5 reflects no documented API, CLI, MCP, webhook, or scripting surface beyond the SketchUp plugin workflow. | Solid | 3.4 | Free tier | None | DWG, XLSX |
| TestFit C1 4/5 reflects public pricing, and C4 4/5 reflects DXF, CSV, glTF, SKP, and PDF coverage. The documented surface is a residential site-layout and unit-mix workflow with Revit, AutoCAD, SketchUp, Zoneomics, ESRI, and Rayon integrations. | Solid | 3.2 | Subscription | None | DXF, CSV, glTF, SKP |
| Finch3D C5 4/5 reflects Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, ArchiCAD, and Autodesk Forma integrations, while C1 3/5 reflects a freemium entry point. The documented file surface is RVT and 3DM, and firm-size fit is solo to small-team. | Solid | 3.2 | Free tier | None | RVT, 3DM |
| Shapr3D C1 4/5 reflects the freemium model with a free Basic tier and $299/yr Pro, C4 3/5 reflects STEP, DWG, OBJ, FBX, STL, IGES, DXF, USDZ, and 3MF exchange, and C5 4/5 reflects KeyShot and SolidWorks-via-STEP handoff. C2 1/5 reflects no documented public API, CLI, or scripting surface, and firm-size fit is solo to small-team. | Solid | 3.0 | Free tier + from $299 | None | STEP, DWG, OBJ, FBX |
| Dwellci C1 4/5 reflects the public self-serve pricing page at $99/month base, and C3 3/5 reflects access for solo and small-team use. RF2 keeps C2 1/5 because delivery is a GUI web app with no public API. | Situational | 2.4 | from $99 | API | |
| Digital Blue Foam C4 4/5 reflects GeoJSON import plus IFC export with Revit and Archicad integrations. RF1 keeps C1 at 1/5 because pricing is enterprise/government custom plus waitlist with no public pricing, and C2 1/5 reflects no public API, CLI, MCP, webhook, or scripting surface. | Situational | 2.4 | Quote-only | API | IFC, GeoJSON |
| Maket.ai C1 2/5 despite freemium pricing, C2 2/5 with no public API, CLI, or scripting surface, and C4 3/5 with DXF, DWG, and PDF output. Firm-size fit is solo to small-team. | Situational | 2.2 | Free tier | None | DXF, DWG, PDF |
| Higharc The conceptual-massing placement is residential plan generation from marked-up PDF inputs rather than open-format massing exchange. RF1 and RF2 keep C1 2/5 and C2 1/5, and C5 3/5 reflects the ECI MarkSystems and US LBM integrations. | Situational | 2.2 | Quote-only | None | |
| Zenerate C4 4/5 reflects RVT, DWG, XLSX, and PDF export from generated site, floor, and parking plans, while RF1 keeps C1 1/5 because access is enterprise quote-gated with no public pricing. C2 1/5 reflects delivery as a GUI web app with no public API. | Situational | 2.2 | Quote-only | API | RVT, DWG, XLSX, PDF |
| Lab Design Tool The conceptual-massing placement is browser-based lab layout and workflow planning rather than general BIM or CAD authoring. RF1 and RF2 keep C1 2/5 and C2 1/5 because pricing is quote-only and no documented API, CLI, or MCP surface is published; C4 2/5 reflects only documented PNG export. | Situational | 2.0 | Quote-only | None | PNG |
| BUILDPLAN The conceptual-massing placement is the site-setup-to-massing workflow with PDF proposal export. RF1 keeps C1 at 1/5 because pricing is sales-led with no disclosed pricing, C2 1/5 reflects no public API, CLI, MCP, webhook, or scripting surface, and C4 3/5 reflects IFC import plus PDF export. | Skip | 1.8 | Quote-only | API | PDF, IFC |